research proposal on corporate governance pdf

International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research

• Review Article
• Published: 03 April 2019
• Volume 50 , pages 457–498, ( 2019 )

Cite this article

• Ruth V. Aguilera 1 , 2 ,
• Valentina Marano 1 &
• Ilir Haxhi 3  

9011 Accesses

95 Citations

6 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

We review four decades of research about the corporate governance of multinational corporations (MNCs), which we label International Corporate Governance (ICG). We identify and discuss three main streams of research that draw on different conceptualizations and theoretical lenses of (corporate) governance. After synthesizing their respective findings, we propose several avenues for future research that integrate these three streams of research with the goal of developing a more nuanced understanding of ICG. We hope this review article will inspire international business scholars to continue examining how corporate governance can be an effective tool for MNC success.

Dans cet article, nous passons en revue quatre décennies de recherche sur la gouvernance d’entreprise des firmes multinationales (FMN), que nous appelons Gouvernance internationale des sociétés (GIS). Nous identifions et discutons trois grands courants de recherche qui s’appuient sur différents angles conceptuels et théoriques de la gouvernance (d’entreprise). Après avoir résumé leurs résultats respectifs, nous proposons plusieurs pistes futures de recherche qui intègrent ces trois axes de recherche dans le but de développer une compréhension plus nuancée de la GIS. Nous espérons que cet article de synthèse inspirera les spécialistes de l’ international business pour continuer à examiner comment la gouvernance d’entreprise peut être un outil efficace pour le succès des FMN.

En este artículo, revisamos cuatro décadas de investigación sobre el gobierno corporativo de una empresa multinacional (EMN), que etiquetamos como Gobierno Corporativo Internacional (GCI). Identificamos y discutimos tres corrientes de investigación que se basan en diferentes conceptualizaciones y lentes teóricos de gobierno (corporativo). Después de sintetizar sus hallazgos respectivos, proponemos diferentes avenidas para la investigación futura que integra estas tres corrientes de investigación con el objetivo de desarrollar una comprensión más matizada del GCI. Esperamos que este artículo de revisión inspire a los académicos de negocios internacionales a continuar examinando como el gobierno corporativo puede ser una herramienta efectiva para el éxito de las EMN.

Neste artigo, revisamos quatro décadas de pesquisas sobre a governança corporativa de corporações multinacionais (MNCs), as quais denominamos Governança Corporativa Internacional (ICG). Identificamos e discutimos três principais correntes de pesquisa que se baseiam em diferentes conceituações e lentes teóricas da governança (corporativa). Depois de sintetizar suas respectivas conclusões, propomos vários caminhos para futuras pesquisas que integram essas três correntes de pesquisa com o objetivo de desenvolver uma compreensão mais sutil da ICG. Esperamos que este artigo de revisão inspire acadêmicos de negócios internacionais a continuar examinando como a governança corporativa pode ser uma ferramenta eficaz para o sucesso das MNCs.

在本文中,我们综述了四十年来关于跨国公司(MNCs)公司治理的研究, 我们将其称为国际公司治理(ICG)。我们确定并讨论了三个主要的利用了(公司)治理不同概念和理论视角的研究分支。在综合了它们各自的研究结果后, 我们提出了未来研究的几种途径, 将这三个研究分支整合在一起, 旨在开发对ICG更细微的理解。我们希望这篇综述文章能启发国际商务学者继续研究公司治理如何能成为跨国公司成功的有效工具。

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save.

• Get 10 units per month
• Download Article/Chapter or eBook
• 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
• Cancel anytime

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Corporate governance: what we know and what we don’t know

The OECD Corporate Governance Principles

Corporate Governance in the EU, the OECD Principles of Corporate Governance and Corporate Governance in Selected Other Jurisdictions

Explore related subjects.

• Artificial Intelligence

Aguilera, R. V., & Crespí-Cladera, R. 2016. Global corporate governance: On the relevance of firms’ ownership structure. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 50–57.

Google Scholar  

Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K., Bednar, M. K., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Connecting the dots: Bringing external corporate governance into the corporate governance puzzle. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1): 483–573.

Aguilera, R. V., Desender, K. A., López-Puertas Lamy, M., & Lee, J. H. 2017. The governance impact of a changing investor landscape. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2): 195–221.

Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. 2008. An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3): 475–492.

Aguilera, R. V., Florackis, C., & Kim, H. 2016. Advancing the corporate governance research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3): 172–180.

Aguilera, R. V., & Grøgaard, B. 2019. The dubious role of institutions in international business. A road forward. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(1): 20–35.

Aguilera, R. V., & Haxhi, I. 2019. Comparative corporate governance in emerging markets. In K. Meyer & R. Grosse (Eds.), Oxford handbook on management in emerging markets . Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190683948.013.9 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 447–465.

Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2010. Comparative and international corporate governance. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 485–556.

Aguilera, R. V., Judge, W. Q., & Terjesen, S. A. 2018. Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43(1): 87–109.

Aguilera, R. V., Kabbach de Castro, L. R., Lee, J. H., & You, J. 2012. Corporate governance in emerging markets. In G. Morgan & R. Whitley (Eds.), Capitalisms and capitalism in the twenty-first century (pp. 319–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Aguilera, R. V., & Williams, C. A. 2009. Law and finance: Inaccurate, incomplete, and important. BYU Legal Review, 9, 1412–1434.

Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. 2006. Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3): 147–158.

Aguilera, V. R., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. 2004. Codes of good governance worldwide: What is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3): 415–443.

Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robbins, G. E. 2005. A clash of capitalisms: Foreign shareholders and corporate restructuring in 1990s Japan. American Sociological Review, 70(3): 451–471.

Akbel, B., & Schnitzer, M. 2011. Creditor rights and debt allocation within multinationals. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(6): 1367–1379.

Allred, B., Findley, M. G., Nielsen, D. L., & Sharman, J. C. 2017. Anonymous shell companies: A global audit study and field experiment in 176 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2): 596–619.

Almond, P., Edwards, T., & Clark, I. 2003. Multinationals and changing national business systems in Europe: Towards the ‘shareholder value’ model? Industrial Relations Journal, 34(5): 430–445.

Arregle, J. L., Duran, P., Hitt, M. A., & Essen, M. 2016. Why is family firms’ internationalization unique? A meta-analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5): 801–831.

Arregle, J. L., Miller, T. L., Hitt, M. A., & Beamish, P. W. 2016. How does regional institutional complexity affect MNE internationalization? Journal of International Business Studies , 47(6): 697–722.

Arthurs, J. D., Hoskisson, R. E., Busenitz, L. W., & Johnson, R. A. 2008. Managerial agents watching other agents: Multiple agency conflicts regarding underpricing in IPO firms. Academy of Management Journal, 51: 277–294.

Athanassiou, N., & Nigh, D. 2002. The impact of the top management team’s international business experience on the firm’s internationalization: Social networks at work. Management International Review, 4(2): 157–181.

Ault, J. K., & Spicer, A. 2014. The institutional context of poverty: State fragility as a predictor of cross-national variation in commercial microfinance lending. Strategic Management Journal, 35(12): 1818–1838.

Banalieva, E., & Eddleston, K. 2011. Home regional focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs. non-family leaders. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(8): 1060–1072.

Bartlett, C. A., & Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing across borders: The transnational solution . Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Bebchuk, L. A., & Kastiel, K. 2017. The untenable case for perpetual dual-class stock. Virginia Law Review, 103: 585–631.

Bell, G., Filatotchev, I., & Aguilera, R. V. 2014. Corporate governance and investors’ perceptions of foreign IPO value: An institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1): 301–320.

Benito, G. R. G., Lunnan, R., & Tomassen, S. 2014. The virtue of in-between pragmatism: A balancing act between responsiveness and integration in a multinational company. In T. Pedersen, M. Venzin, T. Devinney, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), Orchestration of the global network organization (pp. 75–97). Bingley: Emerald.

Benito, G. R. G., Petersen, B., & Welch, L. S. 2009. Towards more realistic conceptualisations of foreign operation mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1455–1470.

Benito, G. R. G., & Tomassen, S. 2010. Governance costs in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. In U. Andersson & U. Holm (Eds.), Managing the contemporary multinational: The role of headquarters (pp. 138–160). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Birkinshaw, J., Holm, U., Thilenius, P., & Arvidsson, N. 2000. Consequences of perception gaps in the headquarters—Subsidiary relationship. International Business Review, 9(3): 321–344.

Birkinshaw, J., & Hood, N. 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review, 23(4): 773–795.

Björkman, I. 1994. Managing Swedish and Finnish multinational corporations: The role of the board of directors in French and Norwegian subsidiaries. International Business Review, 3(1): 47–69.

Björkman, I., & Furu, P. 2000. Determinants of variable pay for top managers of foreign subsidiaries in Finland. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11(4): 698–713.

Boellis, A., Mariotti, S., Minichilli, A., & Piscitello, L. 2016. Family involvement and firms’ establishment mode choice in foreign markets. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(8): 929–950.

Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., Aguilera, R. V., & Andrus, J. L. 2016. Are boards designed to fail? The implausibility of effective board monitoring. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1): 319–407.

Boulton, T. J., Smart, S. B., & Zutter, C. J. 2010. IPO underpricing and international corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(2): 206–222.

Bowe, M., Filatotchev, I., & Marshall, A. 2010. Integrating contemporary finance and international business research. International Business Review, 19(5): 435–445.

Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J. F. 2007. Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal of Management, 33(3): 395–425.

Bruno, V., & Shin, H. S. 2014. Globalization of corporate risk taking. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(7): 800–820.

Buck, T., Liu, X., & Skovoroda, R. 2008. Top executive pay and firm performance in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5): 833–850.

Buckley, P. J. 2009. Internalisation thinking: From the multinational enterprise to the global factory. International Business Review, 18(3): 224–235.

Buckley, P. J., & Casson, M. C. 1976. The future of the multinational enterprise . London: Homes and Meier.

Buckley, P. J., Chen, L., Clegg, L. J., & Voss, H. 2016. Experience and FDI risk-taking: A microfoundational reconceptualization. Journal of International Management, 22(2): 131–146.

Buckley, P. J., & Strange, R. 2011. The governance of the multinational enterprise: Insights from internalization theory. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 460–470.

Bulfone, F. 2016. Insider job: Corporate reforms and power resources in France, Italy and Spain. Socio-Economic Review, 15(2): 435–459.

Cannizzaro, A. P., & Weiner, R. J. 2018. State ownership and transparency in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(2): 172–195.

Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E., & Yang, X. 2009. Varieties of Asian capitalism: Toward an institutional theory of Asian enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(3): 361–380.

Carpenter, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. 2001. Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3): 533–545.

Carpenter, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. 2004. The effects of top management team pay and firm internationalization on MNC performance. Journal of Management, 30(4): 509–528.

Céspedes, J., González, M., & Molina, C. A. 2010. Ownership and capital structure in Latin America. Journal of Business Research, 63(3): 248–254.

Chen, H. L. 2011. Does board independence influence the top management team? Evidence from strategic decisions toward internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(4): 334–350.

Cioffi, J. W. 2000. Governing globalization? The state, law, and structural change in corporate governance. Journal of Law and Society, 27(4): 572–600.

Claessens, S., & Fan, J. P. 2002. Corporate governance in Asia: A survey. International Review of Finance, 3(2): 71–103.

Clegg, S., Geppert, M., & Hollinshead, G. 2018. Politicization and political contests in and around contemporary multinational corporations: An introduction. Human Relations, 71(6): 745–765.

Coase, R. H. 1937. The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16): 386–405.

Costello, A., & Costello, T. 2009. Aligning the interests of subsidiaries and headquarters in multinational corporations: Empirical evidence. Multinational Business Review, 17(4): 163–204.

Cropanzano, R. 2009. Writing nonempirical articles for Journal of Management: General thoughts and suggestions. Journal of Management, 35(6): 1304–1311.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Ramamurti, R. 2014. Understanding multinationals from emerging markets . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cui, L., & Jiang, F. 2012. State ownership effect on firms’ FDI ownership decisions under institutional pressure: A study of Chinese outward-investing firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(3): 264–284.

Cumming, D., Filatotchev, I., Knill, A., Reeb, D. M., & Senbet, L. 2017. Law, finance, and the international mobility of corporate governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(1): 123–147.

Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. 2011. Translating organizational change . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Delios, A. 2011. Governance: The next frontier for research on multinational firms. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 456–459.

Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6): 1155–1177.

Denis, D. K., & McConnell, J. J. 2003. International corporate governance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1): 1–36.

Desender, K. A., Aguilera, R. V., Crespi, R., & Garcia-Cestona, M. 2013. When does ownership matter? Board characteristics and behavior. Strategic Management Journal, 34(7): 823–842.

Desender, K., Aguilera, R. V., López-Puertas Lamy, M., & Crespí, R. 2016. A clash of governance logics: Foreign ownership and board monitoring. Strategic Management Journal, 37(2): 349–369.

Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. 2006. Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doherty, A. M. 2000. Factors influencing international retailers’ market entry mode strategy: Qualitative evidence from the UK fashion sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1–3): 223–245.

Du, Y., Deloof, M., & Jorissen, A. 2011. Active boards of directors in foreign subsidiaries. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2): 153–168.

Du, Y., Deloof, M., & Jorissen, A. 2015. The roles of subsidiary boards in multinational enterprises. Journal of International Management, 21(3): 169–181.

Dunning, J. H. 2001. The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: Past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2): 173–190.

Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. 2016. Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4): 1224–1264.

Eisenhardt, K. M. 1998. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74.

Elger, T., & Smith, C. 2005. Assembling work: Remaking factory regimes in Japanese multinationals in Britain . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, J. A., Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. 2017. Portable country governance and cross-border acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2): 148–173.

Equilar. 2017. Corporate governance outlook 2018. December 2017. Available at: https://www.hoganlovells.com/~/media/hogan-lovells/pdf/select-2017/equilar-corporate_governance_outlook_dec_2017.pdf . Accessed 20 Dec 2018.

Fainshmidt, S., Judge, W. Q., Aguilera, R. V., & Smith, A. 2018. Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries. Journal of World Business, 53(3): 307–322.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2): 301–325.

Fernández, Z., & Nieto, M. J. 2006. Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3): 340–351.

Ferner, A., & Quintanilla, J. 1998. Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: The enduring influence of national identity or a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4): 710–731.

Ferner, A., Quintanilla, J., & Varul, M. Z. 2001. Country-of-origin effects, host-country effects, and the management of HR in multinationals: German companies in Britain and Spain. Journal of World Business, 36(2): 107–127.

Fey, C. F., & Furu, P. 2008. Top management incentive compensation and knowledge sharing in multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12): 1301–1323.

Filatotchev, I., Dyomina, N., Wright, M., & Buck, T. 2001. Strategic choices, export orientation and corporate governance in privatized firms in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus: Theory and empirical evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 32(4): 853–871.

Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., & Nakajima, C. 2013. Corporate governance and national institutions: A review and emerging research agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4): 965–986.

Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. 2010. Internal and external corporate governance: An interface between an organization and its environment. British Journal of Management, 21(3): 591–606.

Filatotchev, I., Poulsen, A., & Bell, R. G. 2018. Corporate governance of a multinational enterprise: Firm, industry and institutional perspectives. Journal of Corporate Finance . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.02.004 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Filatotchev, I., Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. 2008. Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(7): 1133–1148.

Filatotchev, I., Strange, R., Piesse, J., & Lien, Y. C. 2007. FDI by firms from newly industrialised economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4): 556–572.

Filatotchev, I., & Wright, M. 2011. Agency perspectives on corporate governance of multinational enterprises. Journal of Management Studies, 48(2): 471–486.

Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. 2004. The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non) adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4): 501–534.

Forbes, D. P., & Milliken, F. J. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 489–505.

George, G., Wiklund, J., & Zahra, S. A. 2005. Ownership and the internationalization of small firms. Journal of Management, 31(2): 210–233.

Geppert, M., & Matten, D. 2006. Institutional influences on manufacturing organization in multinational corporations: The ‘cherrypicking’ approach. Organization Studies, 27(4): 491–515.

Geppert, M., Williams, K., & Matten, D. 2003. The social construction of contextual rationalities in MNCs: An Anglo-German comparison of subsidiary choice. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 617–641.

Grøgaard, B., Rygh, A. & Benito, G. R. G. (in press. Bringing corporate governance into internalization theory: State ownership and foreign entry strategies. Journal of International Business Studies .

Grøgaard, B., & Verbeke, A. 2012. Twenty key hypotheses that make internalization theory the general theory of international strategic management. In A. Verbeke & H. Merchant (Eds.), Handbook of research in international strategic management (pp. 7–30). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Grosman, A., Aguilera, R. V., & Wright, M. 2018. Lost in translation? Corporate governance, independent boards and blockholder appropriation. Journal of World Business . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2018.09.001 .

Grosman, A., Okhmatovskiy, I., & Wright, M. 2016. State control and corporate governance in transition economies: 25 years on from 1989. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3): 200–221.

Gugler, P. 2017. Emerging countries’ country-specific advantages (CSAs) and competitiveness of emerging market multinational enterprises (EMNEs. Competitiveness Review, 27(3): 194–207.

Hall, P., & Soskice, D. 2001. Varieties of capitalism. The institutional foundations of comparative advantage . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hambrick, D. C. 2007. Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2): 334–343.

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2): 193–206.

Hambrick, D. C., Werder, A. V., & Zajac, E. J. 2008. New directions in corporate governance research. Organization Science, 19(3): 381–385.

Haveman, H. A., Jia, N., Shi, J., & Wang, Y. 2017. The dynamics of political embeddedness in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1): 67–104.

Haxhi, I., & Aguilera, R. V. 2017. An institutional configurational approach to cross-national diversity in corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 54(3): 261–303.

Haxhi, I., & Van Ees, H. 2010. Explaining diversity in the worldwide diffusion of codes of good governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4): 710–726.

Haxhi, I., van Ees, H., & Sorge, A. 2013. A political perspective on business elites and institutional embeddedness in the UK code-issuing process. Corporate Governance: An International Review., 21(6): 535–546.

Hennart, J. F. 2009. Down with MNE-centric theories! Market entry and expansion as the bundling of MNE and local assets. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1432–1454.

Hennart, J. F., Majocchi, A., & Forlani, E. 2017. The myth of the stay-at-home family firm: How family-managed SMEs can overcome their internationalization limitations. Journal of International Business Studies . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-017-0091-y .

Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. 2005. Relationships between top management team characteristics and international diversification: An empirical investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1): 69–78.

Hoenen, A. K., & Kostova, T. 2015. Utilizing the broader agency perspective for studying headquarters—Subsidiary relations in multinational companies. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1): 104–113.

Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. 2013. Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7): 1295–1321.

Jackson, G., & Deeg, R. 2008. Comparing capitalisms: Understanding institutional diversity and its implications for international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4): 540–561.

Jackson, G., & Strange, R. 2008. Why does corporate governance matter for international business? In R. Strange & G. Jackson (Eds.), Corporate governance and international business: Strategy, performance, and institutional Change (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2): 225–264.

Judge, W., Li, S., & Pinsker, R. 2010. National adoption of international accounting standards: An institutional perspective. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(3): 161–174.

Kano, L. 2018. Global value chain governance: A relational perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 49(6): 684–705.

Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. 1997. Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4): 3–10.

Kiel, G. C., Hendry, K., & Nicholson, G. J. 2006. Corporate governance options for the local subsidiaries of multinational enterprises. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6): 568–576.

Kim, B., Prescott, J. E., & Kim, S. M. 2005. Differentiated governance of foreign subsidiaries in transnational corporations: An agency theory perspective. Journal of International Management, 11(1): 43–66.

Kirca, A. H., Hult, G. T. M., Deligonul, S., Perryy, M. Z., & Cavusgil, S. T. 2012. A multilevel examination of the drivers of firm multinationality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 38(2): 502–530.

Knutsen, C. H., Rygh, A., & Hveem, H. 2011. Does state ownership matter? Institutions’ effect on foreign direct investment revisited. Business and Politics, 13(1): 1–33.

Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. 2010. The internationalization of family business: A review of extant research. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(2): 97–107.

Kostova, T. 1999. Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 308–324.

Kostova, T., & Marano, V. 2019. Institutional theory perspectives on emerging economies. In K. Meyer & R. Grosse (Eds.), Oxford handbook on management in emerging markets . Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190683948.001.0001 .

Kostova, T., Marano, V., & Tallman, S. 2016. Headquarters–subsidiary relationships in MNCs: Fifty years of evolving research. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 176–184.

Kostova, T., Nell, P. C., & Hoenen, A. K. 2018. Understanding agency problems in headquarters–subsidiary relationships in multinational corporations: A contextualized model. Journal of Management, 44(7): 2611–2637.

Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. 2008. Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review, 33(4): 994–1006.

Kriger, M. P. 1988. The increasing role of subsidiary boards in MNCs: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(4): 347–360.

Kriger, M. P., & Rich, P. J. J. 1987. Strategic governance: Why and how MNCs are using boards of directors in foreign subsidiaries. Columbia Journal of World Business, 22(4): 39–46.

Kristensen, P. H., & Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local players in global games: The strategic constitution of a multinational corporation . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2): 471–517.

Landini, F., & Pagano, U. 2018. Stakeholders’ conflicts and corporate assets: An institutional meta-complementarities approach. Socio-Economic Review . https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwy017 .

Leksell, L., & Lindgren, U. 1982. The board of directors in foreign subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies, 13(1): 27–38.

Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. 2016. The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2): 525–622.

Licht, A. 2003. Cross-listing and corporate governance: Bonding or avoiding? Chicago Journal of International Law, 4(1): 141–163.

Lien, Y.-C., Piesse, J., Strange, R., & Filatotchev, I. 2005. The role of corporate governance in FDI decisions: Evidence from Taiwan. International Business Review, 14(1): 739–763.

Lu, J., Xu, B., & Liu, X. 2009. The effects of corporate governance and institutional environments on export behaviour in emerging economies. Management International Review, 49(4): 455–478.

Luo, Y. 2005a. Corporate governance and accountability in multinational enterprises: Concepts and agenda. Journal of International Management, 11(1): 1–18.

Luo, Y. 2005b. How does globalization affect corporate governance and accountability? A perspective from MNEs. Journal of International Management, 11(1): 19–41.

Majocchi, A., & Strange, R. 2012. International diversification: the impact of ownership structure, the market for corporate control and board independence. Management International Review, 52(6): 879–900.

Mallin, C. A. 2006. International corporate governance: A case study approach . Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations . New York: Wiley.

Mariotti, S., & Marzano, R. 2019. Varieties of capitalism and the internationalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-00208-2 .

Martinez, J. I., & Jarillo, J. C. 1989. The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3): 489–514.

Miletkov, M., Poulsen, A., & Wintoki, M. B. 2017. Foreign independent directors and the quality of legal institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(2): 267–292.

Morgan, G. 2012. International business, multinationals and national business systems. In G. Wood & M. Demirbag (Eds.), Handbook of institutional approaches to international business (pp. 18–41). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. H. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59(11): 1467–1490.

Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H., & Whitley, R. 2001. The multinational firm, organizing across institutional and national divides . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Muller, M. 1998. Human resource and industrial relations practices of UK and US multinationals in Germany. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(4): 732–749.

Musacchio, A., Lazzarini, S., & Aguilera, R. V. 2015. New varieties of state capitalism: Strategic and governance implications. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1): 115–131.

Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Herrmann, P. 2009. Ownership structure and CEO compensation: Implications for the choice of foreign market entry modes. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(2): 321–338.

Nam, J., Liu, X., Lioliou, E., & Jeong, M. 2018. Do board directors affect the export propensity and export performance of Korean firms? A resource dependence perspective. International Business Review, 27(1): 269–280.

Narula, R., & Verbeke, A. 2015. Making internalization theory good for practice: The essence of Alan Rugman’s contributions to international business. Journal of World Business, 50(4): 612–622.

Nguyen, Q. T., & Rugman, A. M. 2015. Internal equity financing and the performance of multinational subsidiaries in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(4): 468–490.

Nielsen, S. 2010. Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3): 301–316.

Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. 2011. The role of top management team international orientation in international strategic decision-making: The choice of foreign entry mode. Journal of World Business, 46(2): 185–193.

Pauly, L. W., & Reich, S. 1997. National structures and multinational corporate behavior: Enduring differences in the age of globalization. International Organization, 51(1): 1–30.

Pedersen, T., & Thomsen, S. 1999. Business systems and corporate governance. International Studies of Management and Organization, 29(2): 43–59.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach . New York: Harper and Row.

Pongelli, C., Caroli, M. G., & Cucculelli, M. 2016. Family business going abroad: The effect of family ownership on foreign market entry mode decisions. Small Business Economics, 47(3): 787–801.

Pukall, T. J., & Calabrò, A. 2014. The internationalization of family firms: A critical review and integrative model. Family Business Review, 27(2): 103–125.

Qi, Y., Roth, L., & Wald, J. 2017. Creditor protection laws, debt financing, and corporate investment over the business cycle. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4): 477–497.

Roe, M. J. 2003. Political determinants of corporate governance: Political context, corporate impact . New York: Oxford University Press.

Roth, K., & Morrison, A. J. 1992. Implementing global strategy: Characteristics of global subsidiary mandates. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 715–735.

Roth, K., & O’Donnell, S. 1996. Foreign subsidiary compensation strategy: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3): 678–703.

Rugman, A. M. 1981. Inside the multinationals: The economics of internal markets . New York: Columbia University Press.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 1992. A note on the transnational solution and the transaction cost theory of multinational strategic management. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(4): 761–771.

Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. 2008. Internalization theory and its impact on the field of international business. In J. J. Boddewyn (Ed.), International business scholarship: AIB fellows on the first 50 years and beyond (pp. 155–174). Somerville, MA: Emerald.

Rygh, A., & Benito, G. R. G. 2018. Capital structure of foreign direct investments: A transaction cost analysis. Management International Review, 58(3): 389–411.

Sanchez-Bueno, M., & Usero, B. 2014. How may the nature of family firms explain the decisions concerning international diversification? Journal of Business Research, 67(7): 1311–1320.

Sanders, W. G., & Carpenter, M. A. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition, and board structure. Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): 158–178.

Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. 2007. The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 33–56.

Schiehll, E., Ahmadjian, C., & Filatotchev, I. 2014. National governance bundles perspective: Understanding the diversity of corporate governance practices at the firm and country levels. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(3): 179–184.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2): 737–783.

Siegel, J. 2009. Is there a better commitment mechanism than cross-listings for emerging-economy firms? Evidence from Mexico. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7): 1171–1191.

Singh, D., & Gaur, A. S. 2013. Governance Structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19(3): 300–309.

Slangen, A., & Hennart, J. F. 2007. Greenfield or acquisition entry: A review of the empirical foreign establishment mode literature. Journal of International Management, 13(4): 403–429.

Strange, R., Filatotchev, I., Buck, T., & Wright, M. 2009. Corporate governance and international business. Management International Review, 49(4): 395–407.

Streeck, W. 2010. Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 9(1): 137–167.

Sugathan, A., & George, R. 2015. The influence of governance infrastructure and corporate governance on profit shifting. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(8): 886–916.

Takahashi, H., & Yamada, K. 2015. IPOs, growth, and the impact of relaxing listing requirements. Journal of Banking and Finance, 59: 505–519.

Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. 2015. Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2): 233–251.

Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21(6): 689–705.

Tihanyi, L., Aguilera, R. V., Heugens, P., van Essen, M., Sauerwald, S., Duran, P., Turturea, R. (in press. State ownership and political connections. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318822113 .

Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2000. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6): 1157–1177.

Tihanyi, L., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Wan, W. P. 2009. Technological competence and international diversification. Management International Review, 49(4): 409–431.

Tihanyi, L., Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Hitt, M. A. 2003. Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2): 195–211.

Tomassen, S., & Benito, G. R. G. 2009. The costs of governance in international companies. International Business Review, 18(3): 292–304.

Tomassen, S., Benito, G. R. G., & Lunnan, R. 2012. Governance costs in foreign direct investments: A MNC headquarters challenge. Journal of International Management, 18(3): 233–246.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3): 207–222.

Tushman, M. L., & Nadler, D. A. 1978. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review, 3(3): 613–624.

Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. 2009. Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3): 307–319.

Verbeke, A., & Greidanus, N. S. 2009. The end of the opportunism vs trust debate: Bounded reliability as a new envelope concept in research on MNE governance. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9): 1471–1495.

Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2012. The transaction cost economics theory of the family firm: Family-based human asset specificity and the bifurcation bias. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6): 1173–1182.

Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2015. The new internalization theory and multinational enterprises from emerging economies: A business history perspective. Business History Review, 89(3): 415–445.

Verbeke, A., & Kano, L. 2016. An internalization theory perspective on the global and regional strategies of multinational enterprises. Journal of World Business, 51(1): 83–92.

Walgenbach, P., Drori, G. S., & Höllerer, M. A. 2017. Between local mooring and global orientation: A neo-institutional theory perspective on the contemporary multinational corporation. In C. Dörenbächer & M. Geppert (Eds.), Multinational corporations and organization theory: Post millennium perspectives (Vol. 49, pp. 99–125. Somerville, MA: Emerald.

Wang, S. L., Luo, Y., Lu, X., Sun, J., & Maksimov, V. 2014. Autonomy delegation to foreign subsidiaries: An enabling mechanism for emerging-market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(2): 111–130.

Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171–180.

Whitley, R. 1992. Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies . London: Sage.

Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Whitley, R., Morgan, G., Kelly, W., & Sharpe, D. 2003. The changing Japanese multinational: Application, adaptation and learning in car manufacturing and financial services. Journal of Management Studies, 40(3): 643–672.

Williamson, O. E. 1988. The logic of economic organization. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 4(1): 65–93.

Wu, N., & Tihanyi, L. 2013. Corporate governance, multinational firms, and internationalization. In M. Wright, D. S. Siegel, K. Keasey, & I. Filatotchev (Eds.), Handbook of corporate governance (pp. 449–464). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yang, W., & Meyer, K. E. 2018. How does ownership influence business growth? A competitive dynamics perspective. International Business Review . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.02.009 .

Young Baek, H. 2003. Parent-affiliate agency conflicts and foreign entry mode choice. Multinational Business Review, 11(2): 75–98.

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., & Jiang, Y. 2008. Corporate governance in emerging economies: A review of the principal–principal perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1): 196–220.

Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge comments and suggestions from Professor Benito (Editor) and three fantastic anonymous referees, conference participants at the Academy of Management’s 2018 Annual Meeting in Chicago, the International Corporate Governance Society’s 2018 Annual Meeting in Shanghai, and the 2018 Strategic Management Society’s Special Conference in Oslo. All errors remain ours.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

International Business and Strategy, D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Ruth V. Aguilera & Valentina Marano

ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain

Ruth V. Aguilera

Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15953, 1001 NL, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth V. Aguilera .

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Accepted by Gabriel Benito, Consulting Editor, 2 March 2019. This article has been with the authors for three revisions.

See Table  3 .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Aguilera, R.V., Marano, V. & Haxhi, I. International corporate governance: A review and opportunities for future research. J Int Bus Stud 50 , 457–498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00232-w

Download citation

Received : 17 December 2017

Revised : 20 February 2019

Accepted : 02 March 2019

Published : 03 April 2019

Issue Date : 01 June 2019

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00232-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• multinational corporations (MNCs) and enterprises (MNEs)
• corporate governance
• comparative organizational studies
• headquarters–subsidiary roles and relations
• ownership/control structures
• international corporate governance

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Research Proposal on 'Corporate Governance of Financial Institutions in Bangladesh'

11 Pages Posted: 3 May 2015

Syed A. Mamun, PhD, FCMA

Credit Rating Information and Services Limited; Universiti Utara Malaysia - School of Accountancy

Date Written: October 14, 2012

This research proposal is developed to investigate the corporate governance practices of financial institutions in Bangladesh, and to examine the impact of corporate governance practices on the financial performance of the firms.

Keywords: corporate governance index, firm perforamnce, financial insitutions

Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation

Syed Abdulla Al Mamun, PhD, FCMA (Contact Author)

Universiti utara malaysia - school of accountancy ( email ).

Sintok Dhaka, 1213 Malaysia +8801711076816 (Phone)

Credit Rating Information and Services Limited ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on ssrn, paper statistics.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

RESEARCH PROPOSAL Corporate Governance for insurance companies in Mauritius

Related Papers

Sumon Kumar Das

This study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms on firm's performance on listed conventional banking companies at Dhaka Stock Exchange (DSE). Based on existing empirical studies, five key attributes of corporate governance (board size, the proportion of independent directors on board, the proportion of female directors on board, institutional ownership and size of audit committee) have been selected to identify their influence on firm's financial performance. Tobin's Q (a market-based performance measure) and Return on Asset-ROA (an accounting based performance measure) consider as financial performance measures. Using OLS as a method of estimation, the results provide evidence of a significant negative relationship between the performance of the firm and the proportion of independent directors on board as well as size of the audit committee. The result also provides evidence of a significant negative relationship between Tobin's Q and institutional ownership but a positive and insignificant between ROA and institutional ownership. Furthermore, there is a negative relationship between the proportion of female directors in board and the performance of the firm but is not significant. Board size as predictor variable is negative and insignificant with Tobin's Q.

sciepub.com SciEP , Happy C H U K W U D I K E A . Ibe

This study investigated the effect of corporate governance on financial performance of Insurance companies in Nigeria. The study adopted ex-post facto research design and panel data covering five year period from 2011-2015 for twenty insurance companies. The study examined a range of corporate governance mechanisms such as board size, board independence, executive directors' remuneration, non-executive directors' remuneration, directors' ownership, institutional ownership, foreign ownership and the study controlled the effect of the firm size using log of total assets. The Fixed effects model was used to evaluate the effect of these corporate governance mechanisms on financial performance of Nigerian insurance companies. The fixed effect econometric estimates showed that, board size and non-executive directors' remuneration have negative and significant effect on financial performance proxy by return on assets (ROA). While board independence, and institutional ownership indicated positive and significant impact on the financial performance as predicted by agency theory. However, contrary to theoretical predictions executive directors' remuneration, directors' ownership, and foreign ownership did not make significant impact on the financial performance of Nigerian insurance companies. However, the fixed effect econometric estimator employed in this study indicated that corporate governance mechanisms affects the financial performance of Insurance companies in Nigeria. Therefore, the study recommends among other things that the board be restructured to a manageable size, and suggested that a performance-based remuneration be design for the directors. In addition, more non-executive directors should be appointed to the corporate board to enhance the effectiveness of the board in aligning the interest of the stakeholders.

THANKOM ARUN

Md Abu Talha Mridha

The Corporate governance practices are important components in the management and control of an organization affairs. It is concerned with the rules and procedures for making decisions on corporate affairs and provides the structure through which the company objectives are set as well as the means of attaining and monitoring the performance of those objectives. The literature on corporate governance has stirred a lot of debate and led to the large body of theoretical and empirical research. The study examined the effect of corporate governance on the financial performance of SACCO's in Kiambu County. The outcomes from this study indicate that board's compensation will positively contribute to farm's performance. The study thus concludes that compensation of the board positively influence the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. The study also found out that structure influences the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. It was established that structure of the Sacco positively influenced the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. The study thus concludes that 'structure of the firm positively influence the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. It was also established that structure of the Sacco positively influenced the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. The study thus concludes that structure of the firm positively influence the financial performance of deposit taking Sacco's. The outcomes from this study also indicate that board's compensation will positively contribute to firm's performance. As a result, this study recommends that it is necessary or Sacco's to consider an appropriate and competitive compensation level of board's members. The compensation will provide abettor link between shareholders and firm's management and this link will enhance firm's performance to maximize shareholders " value.

Umair Nazir

Tukur Garba

Olayinka, M Ifayemi

The objective of this study is to empirically investigate the relationship between corporate governance (measured by Board Structure index, Ownership Structure index and Audit Committee index) and firm's performance (measured by Return on Asset) of selected Nigerian manufacturing companies. The study adopted ex-post facto research design. Random sampling was used to select 30 companies out of a total population of 45 manufacturing companies listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, for a time period of 2010 to 2014. Secondary data (financial and non-financial) were collected from the annual reports and accounts of the selected listed manufacturing companies. Multiple regression analysis and descriptive statistics were used in analyzing the data. F-stat and t-stat were used to test the hypothesis. The results of the study show that Board structure index had a significant positive relationship with performance (ROA) of the sampled manufacturing companies. Also, it was found that Audit committee index had a positive but insignificant relationship with the performance (ROA) of the sampled manufacturing companies, while Ownership structure index had an insignificant negative relationship with performance (ROA) of the sampled manufacturing companies. In conclusion, the study revealed that the performance indicator (ROA) related with each component of the Corporate Governance Index in a peculiar manner. It is therefore suggested that reform efforts should be directed towards improving the corporate governance of listed Nigerian manufacturing companies, especially emphasis should be devoted to the variables of Ownership Structure and Audit Committee.

European Scientific Journal ESJ

This paper aims to critically review the existing literature on the relationship between the Corporate Governance aspect of board gender diversity, and its influence on corporate performance. This review specifically evaluates theoretical and empirical literature related to board gender diversity and corporate performance with an aim of establishing areas of gaps for further research. In particular the paper identifies some of the important theoretical, operational, measurement, contextual and methodological drawbacks in previous researches and literature that restrict generalization of results to particular contexts, sectors and larger populations. Additionally, several research avenues are proposed for in-depth understanding of the relationship between board gender diversity and corporate performance. Finally, the implication of the study on policy, theory and practice are discussed. Corporate Governance and Board Gender Diversity The concept of corporate governance has continued to elicit lots of scholarly debate owing to multi-dimensionality and multidisciplinary definitions .Among economists and legal scholars, corporate governance is defined as defense of shareholders' interests (Tirole, 2001) Alternately, Shleifer & Vishny, (1997) defined corporate governance as the process though which suppliers of finance to corporations gain assurance of return on their investment. Hill & Jones (2001) assert that corporate governance from a managerial perspective refers to the controls used to ensure that managers' actions are consistent with the interest of key constituent shareholders. From these definitions, corporate governance generally depicts the process which determines the purpose of the organization (whom exists to serve) and how

arifur khan

The paper investigates some corporate attributes that influence the corporate governance disclosure in Bangladesh. An OLS regression model has been used to analyze the data of 100 sample companies listed either with Dhaka Stock Exchange or Chittagong Stock Exchange in 2004. We find that some corporate attributes such as multinational affiliation, linkage of auditor with big four audit firms, concentrated ownership by sponsor and banking companies influence significantly on corporate governance disclosures.

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

Shaikh Noor

Junaid Marshall

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Implications of internal audit effectiveness on corporate governance: Research agenda

• Corporate Ownership and Control 19(3):182-194
• 19(3):182-194

• Fiji National University
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

Abstract and Figures

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations

• Joëlle Tsobze Tiomeguim

• Haslindar Ibrahim
• Anees Janee Ali

• Martin Kyere

• IND MARKET MANAG

• Manish Kacker
• Achmad Dzulfikar Dzikrullah

• Massimo Mastruzzi

• Vibha Tripathi
• THOMAS KUHN
• Saparila Worokinasih
• Muhammad Zaini

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up