(facts, tables, vocabulary lists)
Self-check quizzes, trivia games, word games
Vocabulary test, matching item quiz
Have students show examples/non-examples, student-generated flowcharts
Equations, word problems with given set of data
Suggests psychomotor (hands-on) assessments, design projects and prototypes, simulations
Checklists, videotape the session
Case study, small group critical thinking, teamwork, pair share
Essays, research papers, discussion questions
Develop a portfolio, design a project
Speech, presentation
Instructional goal .
Students will know the conditions of free Blacks during antebellum south.
In at least 2 paragraphs, students will describe the conditions of free Blacks in pre-Civil War America, including 3 of 5 major points that were discussed in class.
A traditional essay or essay exam.
Students will know how to analyze blood counts.
Given a sample of blood and two glass slides, students will demonstrate the prescribed method of obtaining a blood smear for microscopic analysis.
Instructor observation of student demonstration in a lab using a criterion checklist of critical steps for objective scoring.
Students will understand how to interpret classic literature.
Students will compare/contrast Shakespeare’s Merchant of Venice and Marlowe’s Jaw of Malta in terms of plot, character, and social-political themes.
Instructional goals and learning objectives are the heart of your role as a learning facilitator. When written well, goals and objectives will assist you in identifying course content, help you structure your lecture, and allow you to select activities and assessments that are relevant and meaningful for learning. Make sure that you check with your department to determine whether they require certain learning objectives for a course, for example to align courses with Illinois Articulation Initiative (IAI) requirements for transferrable general education courses (see the current NIU Undergraduate Catalog section on “Illinois Articulation Initiative Core Curriculum).
Several sources are available that you can use to check the accuracy and efficacy of your learning objectives. The sources below provide checklists and other instruments to help you design effective and meaningful objectives.
Mager, R. F. (1997). Measuring instructional results: How to find out if your learning objectives have been achieved. (3 rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing learning objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction. (3 rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: CEP Press.
Penn State University, Schreyer Institute (n.p.). Learning outcomes assessment tutorial. https://sites.psu.edu/loatutorial/
Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., Mims, C., & Russell, J. D. (2019). Instructional technology and media for learning (12 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Gronlund, N. E., & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Gronlund’s writing instructional objectives (8 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. (2020). Writing goals and objectives. In Instructional guide for university faculty and teaching assistants. Retrieved from https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide
Phone: 815-753-0595 Email: [email protected]
Facebook page Twitter page YouTube page Instagram page LinkedIn page
Go to Charlotte.edu
What is a course objective.
A course objective specifies a behavior, skill, or action that a student can demonstrate if they have achieved mastery of the objective. As such, objectives need to be written in such a way that they are measurable by some sort of assessment. Course objectives form the foundation of the class. Everything in the course should work together to ensure students master the course objectives.
Good course objectives will be specific , measurable , and written from the learner’s perspective . Here’s a good formula for writing objectives:
Start your course objectives with: By the end of the course, students will be able to:
Choose an action verb that corresponds to the specific action you wish students to demonstrate
Explain the knowledge students are expected to acquire or construct
[Optional]: explain the criterion or level students are expected to reach to show mastery of knowledge
You will also want to make sure that you have thought of a way to assess students’ learned knowledge when writing course objectives. For example, if you always test students’ knowledge of content matter with a multiple choice test, the course objectives cannot ask that students evaluate or create something, as multiple choice tests cannot assess those levels of learning with a high level of accuracy.
If you cannot logically fill in the last blank of this example (assessment), then the objective is not measurable. You won’t include the assessment in the text for your actual course objective that you publish on your syllabus, but you need to know if what you’re asking students to know can be assessed. Otherwise, how can you know or prove that students have learned what they’re supposed to learn in your course?
One thing that can be confusing when creating course objectives is the difference between what students are being asked to know and the assessment that is used to “prove” that students know the information. In the example above, it may be tempting to write something like this: If students have learned U.S. History since 1865, then they should be able to write an essay comparing and contrasting the effect of two immigrant populations on American culture from 1865-1900.
This objective seems measurable, but it’s saying that by the end of the class “students should be able to write an essay”. That makes it sound like one of the objectives of the course is for students to write an essay. What students really need to know though is the effect of immigration on American culture. If you use the assessment in the “course objective slot,” the knowledge students need in order to complete the assessment is assumed rather than explicitly stated.
This could cause issues with the creation of materials and activities in your units because the focus may be on teaching students how to write essays rather than teaching them about the effect of immigration on American culture during a specific time period.
Using a taxonomy that explains different levels of learning can be helpful for selecting the appropriate action verbs for your course objectives. These will help prevent you from choosing lower order actions when you really want students to demonstrate higher order thinking.
Bloom’s Taxonomy is broken into six knowledge dimensions: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating and range from lower order thinking skills to higher order thinking skills.
By their very nature, higher order thinking skills are more difficult and build on the previous lower order thinking skills. An oversimplified explanation of this would be the following: A student can not be expected to create a design brief (Creating) if they can’t remember what a design brief is (Remembering).
Traditionally, entry level courses ask students to demonstrate remembering, understanding, and applying thinking skills with a few higher order thinking skills while graduate level courses ask students to demonstrate analyzing, evaluating, and creating thinking skills with a few lower order thinking skills.
Course objectives are much broader in scope than module level objectives. Where module objectives break down skills and knowledge into very specific, discrete skills, course objectives point more to overarching student understanding and higher level thinking skills. In a unit, you may have 10 or more objectives explaining all of the steps/tasks involved in learning a concept. For a course, you will only want 3-6 course objectives.
Home » Blog » How To Write SMART Learning Objectives & Outcomes
As a methodology first created for business management, SMART has since been adapted across numerous fields, including education. SMART objectives offer a structured framework to help educators design effective learning goals that are clear, focused, and reachable. They ensure that learners can understand what is expected from them, fostering a more efficient and meaningful learning experience.
The SMART framework breaks down learning objectives into five key characteristics: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Each characteristic plays a pivotal role in creating a comprehensive learning goal that is practical, attainable, and aligned with overall educational targets.
George T. Doran first proposed the SMART framework in the November 1981 issue of Management Review . In his initial formulation, Doran’s A stood for “assignable,” meaning a task that can meaningfully be given to a specified individual. His R stood for “realistic,” a concept now captured by the latter-day “achievable” component.
In its current form, the framework offers a set of criteria that can be applied to any learning methodology to ensure that its content and assessment systems are fit for purpose.
The learning objective should be well-defined, clear, and unambiguous. Instead of setting a broad or generic goal, educators should aim to specify what the learner will achieve upon successful completion of the course or lesson.
Another way to think of this is to consider what the learner will be able to do or understand, having completed the course, that they couldn’t have done or understood beforehand. How will it change their work life, skillset, or understanding?
The objective must include criteria for measuring progress and outcome. This ensures that the learner’s progress can be tracked, and the effectiveness of the learning process can be evaluated.
With eLearning content , there are numerous ways to measure progress and comprehension, including completion percentages, internal quizzes, and final assessments. Various interactive tools allow for gamifying the process of measurement with puzzles and challenges that can be inserted into the course material to maintain interest and gauge understanding.
The learning objective should be realistic and attainable. While ambitious goals can be motivational, they should not be so challenging as to be unattainable, which might lead to frustration or discouragement.
Stepped courses with modules for complete beginners, intermediate-level learners and experts can help ensure that the student completes a course at a level they can manage. Courses should avoid being too lengthy or complicated, or the end goal can begin to seem unreachable.
Break down your course materials into slides, lessons, and modules to motivate students to persist, and reward completion stages with badges, congratulations, or other markers of success.
The objective should align with the learner’s broader educational or professional goals, ensuring the learning process is meaningful and applicable to their overall development. This is particularly important in mandatory training courses such as fire and safety training, first aid or DEI courses.
By tailoring courses to the day-to-day situations your students and employees will face, you will increase engagement.
If a course has an in-person element, make sure it incorporates time for students to discuss how each lesson relates to their own life or work. Lively discussions will follow, and the relevance of the topic will hit home.
Each objective should have a defined timeline, offering a clear deadline for when the learning goal should be achieved. This enhances motivation and allows progress tracking over time.
Run many trials of your courses and time how long it takes the average student to complete the various modules, then tweak the content and design accordingly. Experience has shown that an individual module should take no longer than 15 minutes to complete.
Another good idea is to give students a realistic notion of how long each part of the course will take to finish. This will allow them to allocate sufficient time for completion, without having to interrupt their flow.
Creating SMART learning objectives involves six critical steps – an initial definitional stage and then one step for each concept in the SMART framework. By following these steps methodically, you’ll ensure your courses are well-designed and fit for purpose.
Before setting an objective, identify the desired learning outcomes of the lesson or course. What should learners know or be able to do by the end? It’s a good idea to specify this up front to set expectations.
When you’ve devised the course, you can run tests and examine the achieved outcomes. Do they match your intentions when designing the course? If not, a rethink may be required.
Use action verbs to precisely define what the learner will achieve. Clearly state the scope of the objective to eliminate ambiguity.
Here’s an example of a poorly written course objective:
“Students will gain an understanding of the basics of social media marketing.”
And here’s that objective written with more specificity (with action verbs in bold):
“Students will appreciate the different audiences of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and TikTok, understand the marketing objectives that can be achieved using each one, and will practise using some marketing techniques to make best use of each medium.”
Define clear, quantifiable criteria to evaluate progress and success. You might establish various methods of assessment, including quizzes, projects, or discussions.
Be very transparent upfront about what constitutes an excellent, good, or acceptable “pass mark.” While some courses pass or fail only (driver’s tests, for example), others have gradations of achievement.
It can be difficult to quantify comprehension of a complex topic with multiple choice questions, so if it is vital that students gain an in-depth knowledge of a complex subject, then it is better to include a project, in-person assessment or written essay.
Without some sort of measurable outcome, there’s a danger students can complete courses as “lip service” to the notion of education, without really learning anything.
Consider the resources available and the learners’ current capabilities when setting objectives. This ensures that the goals are challenging but within reach.
It can be helpful to run a “pre-assessment” test or questionnaire to gauge current comprehension level. If you do so, make sure you stress that there is no good or bad level of achievement; you are simply trying to identify a place to begin.
Match your course materials to the age, reading level and/or educational level of your students. Don’t use overly complicated language when simpler terms will do.
Align the learning objectives with the overall goals of the course and the individual learner’s needs. This ensures the learning process is valuable and beneficial for the learner.
Online systems allow for a high degree of learning personalisation of courses, including offering modules in a range of languages or including various optional extras.
As well as making the course content fit students’ needs, you need to make sure the outcomes match what they’ll be able to use in their employment or day-to-day lives.
For instance, if you were teaching a course in beer-making in a microbrewery setting, but most of your students were likely to work in commercial breweries, it would be wise to tailor the outcomes to include those very different environments.
Set clear deadlines for each objective. Balance the time constraints with the scope of the objective to ensure it’s feasible within the given timeframe. This may involve a degree of trial and error as you’re designing the course.
There’s little more frustrating than being told a course must be completed in one hour, only to find that its quizzes are so lengthy and challenging that it takes twice as long to finish.
Here are examples of SMART objectives in different settings:
“In this semester, students will improve their writing skills by composing and revising at least three essays, with each essay receiving a score of 70% or higher.”
Note that there is room for variation in this objective – some students may complete three essays while others may do more. 70% is an ambitious but not unrealistic goal if your student intake has been pre-selected for basic literacy.
“By the end of this 20-hour online photography course, participants will produce a portfolio of ten high-quality photographs demonstrating mastery of advanced lighting techniques.”
This course may use advanced photo analytics to judge whether specific lessons about dynamic range, composition, colour, focus and subject choice have been adhered to and demonstrated.
What’s especially good about this objective is that it specifies the completion time (20 hours) and work volume (ten photos) very precisely.
“Within six months, team members will complete an advanced project management course, implement new strategies in their work, and show a 20% decrease in project overruns.”
Although the 20% overrun reduction may prove ambitious, it’s likely that the course organisers have researched the difference between the effect on deadlines of trained versus untrained teams.
“Within six months” is time-bound, but allows some wriggle room, for learners who can complete their coursework more quickly. The objective promises real professional and personal development.
Each of the above examples is specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
Enhanced focus and clarity.
SMART objectives provide clear and concise goals, aiding learners in understanding exactly what is expected. They ensure that a higher percentage of learners engage with course materials and see courses through to completion.
Because they’re measurable, SMART objectives make progress tracking and outcome assessment easier and more effective. It becomes easier to demonstrate the efficacy of a course, and to identify places where materials can be improved in future iterations.
Achievable and time-bound objectives motivate and engage learners by providing clear goals and a sense of urgency. They can foster a spirit of friendly rivalry too, as team members compete with one another to gain the best completion scores.
Here are some of the frequent pitfalls course creators face:
Methods for effective implementation include:
Creating SMART learning objectives plays an important role in enhancing educational effectiveness. It enables learners to understand expectations, focus their efforts, and measure their progress.
As an eLearning company , Skillshub is committed to creating efficient and impactful learning experiences.
We incorporate these principles into our learning modules, providing a well-rounded eLearning platform and approach that caters to each learner’s unique needs and abilities.
Join us today to elevate your learning experience!
Sean McPheat
Sean is the CEO of Skillshub. He’s a published author and has been featured on CNN, BBC and ITV as a leading authority in the learning and development industry. Sean is responsible for the vision and strategy at Skillshub, helping to ensure innovation within the company.
Updated on: 6 September, 2023
Would your connections like this too? Please share.
You might also be interested in…
Learning objectives aren’t just a list of what you’re covering in class. Good learning objectives are what you want your students/trainees to learn or achieve (“by the end of this course, you will be able to...”). If you don’t know the end goal—and you don’t have certain measurable checkpoints—you can get lost along the way. Here are some tips to help you get started:
Before you begin writing objectives, stop and think about what type of change you want your training to make. In other words, what do you want your participants to do differently when they return to work? The domains of learning can be categorized as affective (attitude), psychomotor (skills), and cognitive (knowledge). An easy way to remember this is with the acronym ASK :
Now that you’ve identified what domain you intend to focus on for your objective, it’s time to start crafting your objective. To do that, it’ll help to have an action verb to describe the behavior at the appropriate level of learning. Here’s a list of action verbs, separated by domain. Avoid having more than one action verb for each level of learning, and make sure it’s a verb that can be measured. “Understand” is too vague, but “complete,” “identify,” or “recognize” are specific.
3. create your very own objective.
Now it's your turn to give it a whirl.
Make sure your objectives include four pieces: audience, behavior, condition, and degree of mastery. For every one, identify and label the component. Here are the A, B, C, D's every objective should contain:
Behavior: , condition: , degree of mastery: .
Try labeling each of the four components in your objectives to make sure you didn't forget anything. In the following examples, the audience will be italicized, the behavior will be underlined, the condition will be in regular type, and the degree of mastery will be bolded.
Given an expense report, the learner will complete the company form with no errors .
After completing the three-day design training, the learner will be able to list the 8 steps in the design process in order .
Go through this process for each objective. Don’t stop until you feel that you have enough objectives to effectively measure your performance. Remember, objectives work as checkpoints that lead to a completion of a goal. It’s important you have enough of them to keep yourself from getting lost. Start with what you want to achieve and work backwards.
If you'd like to up your game creating objectives or designing a class, check out one of our courses , particularly the workshop on Instructional Design.
Need help with virtual training or learning? Take a look at the Interactive Virtual Trainer workshop.
Published originally by Jordan Meyers, adapted from Becky Pluth’s session on writing objectives at the 2014 Creative Training Techniques conference.
Never miss a post! Get blogs and more delivered directly to your inbox.
Stay connected to what’s going on in the training industry.
10800 Lyndale Avenue South - Suite 151 - Bloomington, MN 55420
Astrid Tran • 22 April, 2024 • 7 min read
Objectives are needed for every aspect of life, work and education.
Whether you are setting objectives for academic research, teaching and learning, courses and training, personal development, professional growth, a project, or more, having clear objectives like having a compass to help you stay on track.
So, how to write objectives? Check out this article to get a complete guide on writing realistic and impactful objectives.
Table of Contents
How to write objectives for a presentation, how to write objectives for lesson plan, how to write objectives for a research, how to write objectives for personal growth.
More tips on how to write objectives
Project objectives often focus on tangible results, such as completing specific tasks, delivering products, or achieving certain milestones within a defined timeframe.
Writing project objectives should follow these principles:
Start early : It is important to set your project objectives at the beginning of your project to avoid unexpected situations and employees misunderstanding.
Changes : Project objectives can be determined to address challenges of previous projects experience and seek to minimize potential risks prior to the project begins.
Achievement : An objective of a project should mention what success is. Different success is measured by specific and measurable objectives.
OKR : OKR stands for "objectives and key results," a managerial model that aims to set goals and identify metrics to measure progress. Objectives are your destination, while key results contribute to the path that will get you there.
Focus : Different project objectives might consist of related issues such as:
For example :
Presentation objectives outline what you intend to accomplish with your presentation, which might involve informing, persuading, educating, or inspiring your audience. They guide the content creation process and shape how you engage your listeners during the presentation.
When it comes to writing presentation objectives, there are some notes to look at:
The questions "Why" : To write a good presentation objective, start with answering why questions, such as Why is this presentation important to your audience? Why should people invest time and money to attend this presentation? Why is your content important to the organization?
What do you want the audience to know, feel and do ? Another important of writing objectives for a presentation is considering the comprehensive impact your presentation has on the audience. This pertains to the informational, emotional, and actionable aspect.
Rule of three : When you write your objectives in your PPT, don't forget to express no more than three key points per slide.
Some examples of objectives:
Start meaningful discussion, get useful feedback and educate your students. Sign up to take free AhaSlides template
Learning objectives, often used in education and training, specify what learners are expected to gain from a learning experience. These objectives are written to guide curriculum development, instructional design, and assessment.
A guide on writing an objective for learning and lesson plan described as follows:
Learning objectives verbs : There is no better way to have learning objectives start with measurable verbs collected by Benjamin Bloom based on level of cognition.
Student-centered : Objectives should reflect the unique aspirations, strengths and weaknesses of each student, emphasize what students will know or be able to do, not what you will teach or cover.
Learning Objective Examples:
The purpose of research objectives is congruent with research study outcomes.They articulate the purpose of the research, what the researcher intends to investigate, and the expected outcomes.
There are severals principles to follow to ensure a well-written research objectives:
Academic language : It is important to note that research writing is strict on the use of language. It is held to a high standard of clarity, precision, and formality.
Avoid using first-person references to state the objectives. Replace "I will" with neutral phrasing that emphasizes the research's intention. Avoid emotional language, personal opinions, or subjective judgments.
Pinpoint the Focus : Your research objectives should clearly articulate what your study aims to investigate, analyze, or uncover.
Specify the Scope : Outline the boundaries of your research by specifying the scope. Clearly delineate what aspects or variables will be examined, and what will not be addressed.
Maintain Consistency with Research Questions : Ensure your research objectives align with your research questions.
Frequently used phrases in research objectives
Objectives for personal growth often focus on individual improvement on skills, knowledge, well-being, and overall development.
Personal growth objectives encompass various aspects of life, including emotional, intellectual, physical, and interpersonal dimensions. They serve as roadmaps for continuous learning, growth, and self-awareness.
Tips to write objectives for personal growth from AhaSlides.
💡 Development Goals For Work: A Step-By-Step Guide For Beginners with Examples
💡 What is Personal Growth? Set Up Personal Goals For Work | Updated in 2023
💡 Work Goals Examples For Evaluation with +5 Steps To Create in 2023
How to write objectives in general? Here are common tips for setting objectives of any field.
#1. Be concise and straightforward
Keep the words as simple and straightforward as much as possible. It is much better to remove unnecessary or ambiguous words that might lead to misunderstanding.
#2. Keep your number of objectives limited
Don't confuse your learners or readers with too many objectives. Concentrating on a few key objectives can effectively maintain focus and clarity and prevent overwhelming.
#3. Use action verbs
You can start each objective with one of the following measurable verbs: Describe, Explain, Identify, Discuss, Compare, Define, Differentiate, List, and more.
#4. Be SMART
SMART objectives framework can be defined with specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. These objectives are clearer and easier to understand and achieve.
⭐ Want more inspiration? Check out AhaSlides to explore the innovative way to get presentations and lesson engaging and fun!
What are the 3 parts of an objective?
According to Mager (1997), objective statements contain three parts: behavior (or, performance), conditions, and criteria.
What are the 4 elements of a well-written objective?
The four elements of an objective are Audience, Behavior, Condition, and Degree, called A-B-C-D method. They are used to identify what a student is expected to know and how to test them.
What are the 4 components of objective writing?
There are four components of an objective include: (1) the action verb, (2) conditions, (3) standard, and (4) the intended audience (always the students)
Ref: Indeed | Batchwood |
I've got my rhythm with words
Tips to Engage with Polls & Trivia
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .
Writing effective learning objectives is a necessary skill in academic medicine. Learning objectives are clearly written, specific statements of observable learner behavior or action that can be measured upon completion of an educational activity. They are the foundation for instructional alignment whereby the learning objectives, assessment tools, and instructional methods mutually support the desired learning outcome. This review article describes the essential components of a learning objective and provides practical tips on writing well-defined learning objectives.
An anesthesiologist starts his grand rounds presentation on the topic of malignant hyperthermia (MH) with the following learning objectives:
This list informs the attendees about the topics covered during the presentation. However, do they know what is expected of them when they apply this content in their own clinical practice?
We have all seen learning “objectives” mentioned, such as the ones above, at the beginning of a presentation or workshop. But is what we see actually a learning objective ? Learning objectives are often confused with learning goals; the example above is such a case in point. Learning goals are related to—but different from—learning objectives. A learning goal is a broad statement of an expected learning outcome of a course or curriculum. Learning goals provide a vision for the future and often summarize the intention or topic area of several related learning objectives. Learning objectives are drawn from the learning goals. They are guiding statements for each learning encounter, and they connect intention with reality within the learning experience as well as to the assessment planned. In keeping with the Roman philosopher Lucius Seneca, who said, “If a man knows not to which port he sails, no wind is favorable,” this review article describes the essential components of learning objectives and provides practical tips on writing well-defined learning objectives.
A learning objective is a description of what the learner must be able to do upon completion of an educational activity. A well-written learning objective outlines the knowledge, skills and/or attitude the learners will gain from the educational activity and does so in a measurable way.
An effective learning objective should include the following 5 elements: who, will do, how much or how well, of what, by when. 1 The mnemonic SMART—Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, and Time-bound—can be used to describe the elements of a well-written learning objective. 2 One example of a SMART objective for an airway conference is: “Upon completion of the difficult airway workshop, participants should be able to formulate an accurate algorithm for the management of an obese adult patient with inadequate face mask ventilation, according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists difficult airway algorithm.”
Practical tips for writing learning objectives are summarized in Table 1 . Since the point of a learning objective is to describe the intended outcome for learning, begin the learning objective with: “Upon completion of this educational activity, learners should be able to . . . .” The next step is to identify the concepts the learners need to learn and how they will demonstrate their understanding. It is recommended that the instructor choose one action verb that is measurable and observable. Verbs such as understand , know , learn , appreciate , believe , be familiar with , comprehend , and so on, are not observable or measurable and should be avoided. Each learning objective must be separate; two actions (such as diagnosis and management ) or topics (such as bronchospasm and hypotension ) must not be combined. It is also important that the action verb identify the level and cognitive domain at which the learner is expected to perform. Bloom's Taxonomy connects the depth of learning with action verbs that may be used when writing learning objectives.
Practical tips for writing effective learning objectives.
When writing learning objectives, educators leverage Bloom's Taxonomy 3 ( Table 2 ). Bloom's Taxonomy describes 6 levels of hierarchy in the cognitive domain: knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. This taxonomy was revised in 2001 4 ( Figure 1 ). Each level of the hierarchy correlates to action verbs that educators use within learning objectives. To help anesthesia educators apply Bloom's Taxonomy more readily to their own learning, we will briefly review what each level of the hierarchy means to learning.
Original and revised versions of Bloom's Taxonomy (Reprinted with permission from Wilson LO. http://thesecondprinciple.com )
Revised Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Objectives
(Adapted from http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colleges/medicalschool/education/degree_programs/MDProgram/administration/curriculumoffice/Documents/CUSOM_Learning-Objectives-Guidelines.pdf )
Knowledge “involves the recall of specifics and universals, the recall of methods and processes, or the recall of a pattern, structure, or setting.” 3 This category appreciates and distinguishes factual knowledge, conceptual knowledge, procedural knowledge, and metacognitive knowledge as separate elements of “knowledge.” In anesthesia teaching, we frequently use the first 3 types. For example, we provide factual knowledge (eg, lecture to undergraduate medical learners), procedural knowledge (eg, teaching in simulation or during an operation), and conceptual knowledge (eg, case-based learning, principles of anesthesia). Metacognitive knowledge is often applicable when giving feedback to learners; for example, when helping learners understand their competency in communication with patients and families.
Comprehension “refers to a type of understanding or apprehension such that the individual knows what is being communicated and can make use of the material or idea being communicated without necessarily relating it to other material or seeing its fullest implications.” 3 Application refers to the “use of abstractions in particular and concrete situations.” 3 Analysis represents the “breakdown of a communication into its constituent elements or parts such that relative hierarchy of ideas is made clear and/or the relations between ideas expressed are made explicit.” 3 Synthesis involves “putting together of elements and parts so as to form a whole,” 3 and evaluation includes “judgments about the value of material and methods for given purposes.” 3
All educators should make the important connection between the intended learning depth (eg, comprehension) and the action verbs that reflect that intended learning outcome within the learning objective. Action verbs guide the learner about the intended outcome; for example, “critically appraise the evidence related to rapid sequence induction for airway management in pregnant patients.”
Both Bloom's Taxonomy and SMART are necessary for writing effective learning objectives that communicate the intention for the learner with the intended learning outcomes. Examples of weak learning objectives and suggestions for better wording, based on incorporating Bloom's Taxonomy and SMART, are listed in Table 3 .
Examples of weak learning objectives and suggestions for SMARTer learning objectives. All of the learning objectives are written for an hour-long grand rounds presentation and begin with “Upon completion of the grand rounds presentation, participants should be able to:”
When faculty are leading sessions on writing SMART objectives, the authors often hear participants challenge that SMART objectives are longer and very detailed—consequently, will learners even follow them? The counterargument is that any objective worded too broadly, with no measurable standard that is attainable and repeatable for the learner in the given time frame, leads to confusion about “what to study” or “what performance is expected.” The value in writing SMART objectives includes helping educators focus and specify what they intend to teach, assess, and offer as feedback for the learner. This shapes the learning session's scope, the method of instruction, and the type and quality of the assessment.
For many, writing out the learning objectives appears to be an effort to its own end. However, learning objectives are the foundation for instructional alignment. Instructional alignment means that learning objectives, assessment tools, and instructional methods mutually support the same educational outcome. 5 This is known as the Golden Triangle 5 ( Figure 2 ). Well-defined learning objectives outline the desired outcome for learners, which will help specify the instructional method. For example, if we want the learners to demonstrate correct intubation procedure in a normal adult 100% of the time, we need the instructional method to involve some sort of hands-on experience so that learners can demonstrate their skills. In contrast, if the teacher lectures about correct intubation without the opportunity for learners to complete hands-on skills, the learning activity is not aligned with the stated learning objective.
Instructional alignment of learning objectives, assessment and instructional methods.
Likewise, learning objectives guide the assessment method. Taking the above example: If the objective is for learners to be 100% successful in normal adult intubation, assessing their skill using a written exam would misalign the objective and assessment method. As educators, we would miss the accuracy of the skill! Instead, the assessment method needs hands-on performance.
Constructive alignment underscores what learning objectives contribute towards achieving the intended educational outcomes. Learning objectives also contribute to shaping expectations, preparing learners for the educational activity and the standard by which their performance will be measured; the objectives also define faculty and learner responsibilities towards achieving the intended learning outcomes. Learning objectives may also guide teaching, by defining and limiting content or activities.
Learning objectives are a required component in the planning of all medical education curricula. At the undergraduate level, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) requires that “the faculty of a medical school define its medical education program objectives in outcome-based terms that allow the assessment of medical student's progress in developing the competencies that the profession and the public expect of a physician.” 6 At the graduate medical education level, one of the common program requirements from the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) states that each program must distribute competency-based goals and objectives for each assignment at every educational level. 7 Even for continuing medical education (CME), both the American Medical Association (AMA) and Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) require that a CME activity has learning objectives to qualify for category 1 credit. 8 Consequently, writing effective learning objectives is a core skill that every academic anesthesiologist should master.
Writing effective learning objectives is a necessary skill in academic medicine. Well-defined learning objectives describe what the learner must be able to achieve upon completion of the educational activity. Bloom's Taxonomy and SMART are two tools that educators may leverage towards writing learning objectives that effectively relate the intended outcomes to the learners, simultaneously setting up the educators to successfully attain the learning outcomes within the time and resources provided. The successful academic anesthesiologist can align the instructional method, assessment, and intended learning outcome by using SMART learning objectives rather than learning goals. In closing, we revisit the learning goals in the opening anecdote of this review article.
Upon completion of the grand rounds presentation, participants will be able to:
rrh: Learning Objectives
Financial Disclosures: None.
Conflicts of Interest: None.
Author Contributions: Debnath Chatterjee, MD, wrote the manuscript and reviewed the final draft before submission. Janet Corral, PhD, reviewed the initial and final draft and contributed to the content.
TeachCatalystAI is a professional teaching assistant tool designed to help teachers create lesson plan, teaching materials, and many more with ease. Our AI-powered tool will help you streamline your classroom management, making it easier to keep track of students, assignments, and behavior. Our AI-powered tools and templates are great and configured to make you effective in teaching.
Creating effective lesson objectives is a crucial part of educational planning that significantly impacts student engagement and learning outcomes. Utilizing the SMART criteria —Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound—educators can formulate objectives that clarify expectations and enhance assessment practices.
Understanding the target audience and aligning objectives with educational standards are also vital steps that are often missed. As we examine these strategies in more detail, it becomes clear that the subtleties of crafting objectives can greatly influence the classroom environment.
Educators should consider various factors, such as student interests, learning styles, and available resources, to optimize their effectiveness in lesson planning .
Understanding your audience is crucial for effectively developing lesson objectives . Gaining insight into student demographics allows educators to adjust their instructional strategies to accommodate the diverse needs of their learners. Recognizing aspects such as age, cultural background, and prior knowledge leads to a more responsive teaching approach, which ensures that all students feel valued and included.
Moreover, acknowledging different learning preferences plays a significant role in enhancing the educational experience. Some students excel in collaborative settings, while others thrive with independent work or hands-on activities. Identifying these preferences enables educators to design lesson objectives that cater to various learning styles, which fosters engagement and motivation among students.
One effective method for crafting clear and achievable lesson objectives is to apply the SMART criteria, which stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. This structured approach ensures that your objectives are not only well-defined but also actionable, fostering meaningful learning experiences for your students.
Integrating effective social-emotional learning strategies can enhance the clarity and relevance of your lesson objectives by linking them to students’ emotional and social development.
Measurable outcomes play a crucial role in developing lesson objectives, as they establish a clear framework for assessing student progress and achievement. Focusing on measurable indicators enables educators to formulate objectives that support outcome-based assessment, leading to a more organized approach to teaching and learning.
Learning Domain | Objective Example | Measurable Indicator |
---|---|---|
Knowledge | Identify key historical events | List 5 events with corresponding dates |
Skills | Perform a specific mathematical operation | Solve 10 problems accurately |
Attitudes | Demonstrate respect in group settings | Engage in 3 group activities |
Application | Apply concepts in real-world scenarios | Complete a project utilizing learned concepts |
Establishing measurable outcomes ensures that both educators and students have a clear understanding of expectations and success criteria. This clarity supports targeted instruction and allows for effective evaluation of student performance, ultimately enhancing the overall learning experience.
Aligning lesson objectives with established standards is vital for effective teaching . Understanding the required standards and integrating relevant frameworks enables educators to ensure that their objectives fulfill educational expectations . This alignment fosters clear objectives that set expectations for students and guide lesson planning.
Using tools such as rubrics aligned with the standards can help in measuring student progress effectively. This approach not only enhances lesson planning but also contributes significantly to the overall learning experience, making it more relevant and impactful for students.
Here are some significant points to consider when understanding required standards:
Understanding these standards not only supports effective lesson planning but also promotes a structured approach to teaching that benefits both educators and students.
Integrating relevant frameworks is crucial for ensuring that lesson objectives align with established standards , thereby enhancing the overall educational experience . The process begins with a clear understanding of the specific standards that dictate educational goals. Careful selection of frameworks that align with these standards allows educators to ensure that lesson objectives are not only pertinent but also effective.
The next phase involves integrating the selected frameworks into lesson plans in a seamless manner. This integration ensures that the frameworks align with both educational objectives and assessment strategies, resulting in a cohesive learning experience .
This approach not only enhances the educational experience but also promotes accountability and supports student growth, making it a vital aspect of teaching and learning.
The importance of clear and concise lesson objectives can be demonstrated through the following table:
Objective Type | Example Objective | Targeted Skills |
---|---|---|
Knowledge | Identify key elements of a narrative | Analysis, Understanding |
Application | Demonstrate solving a quadratic equation | Problem-Solving, Application |
Analysis | Compare and contrast two historical events | Critical Thinking, Evaluation |
Synthesis | Create a presentation on climate change | Creativity, Communication |
Evaluation | Assess the effectiveness of a marketing strategy | Judgment, Evaluation |
Moreover, establishing clear learning objectives enhances alignment with assessments and boosts student engagement. To support this ongoing development, consider the following strategies:
Developing communication skills through collaborative learning, proactive classroom management strategies for educators.
You have full access to this open access article
Secure messaging (SM) is an important aspect of communication for patients with cancer. SM fosters patient-clinician communication and helps patients with symptom management and treatment support. However, patients are uncertain about how to phrase messages appropriately and have expressed the need for guidance. In response, we designed a user-centered, web-based application named SEND The application focuses on specificity, expression, needs, and directness through interactive video tutorials and quizzes. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate SEND based on its levels of engagement, satisfaction, acceptability, and appropriateness. We recruited 101 patients with various cancer diagnoses to use SEND and then fill out a survey 1 to 2 weeks later about their experience. Patients’ mean age was 64 years; most were male (55%), white (83%), diagnosed with cancer in 2020 with high levels of self-efficacy, and 51% had a bachelor’s degree or higher. 65% were engaged in the application, and respondents spent an average of 15 min interacting with SEND Satisfaction was 90.4%, 85.4% found it acceptable, and 88.6% appropriate. There were no statistically significant differences across age, sex, race, education, or year of diagnosis. Results underscore the potential of eHealth interventions, like SEND, in enhancing patient-clinician communication in cancer care. By empowering patients with effective message-writing techniques, SEND has the potential to improve the quality of SM, which can lead to faster response times and more patient-centered responses.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
High-quality patient-clinician communication enables access to care, increases patient knowledge and shared understanding, enhances therapeutic alliances, empowers patients, and contributes to higher-quality medical decisions [ 1 ]. Secure messaging (SM), asynchronous electronic communication between patients and clinicians, enables patients with cancer to easily interact with clinicians [ 2 , 3 ]. It allows patients to be involved in their care and can strengthen the patient-clinician relationship [ 4 , 5 ]. SM is particularly advantageous for symptom management. Patients with cancer receiving treatment report that they appreciated the ability to contact clinicians easily and felt encouraged, supported, and more aware of symptoms [ 6 ].
Patients with cancer prefer to communicate with clinicians via SM rather than on the phone [ 7 ], and the utilization of SM has grown exponentially [ 8 ]. Typically used for non-urgent medical questions, patients value SM communication replies from clinicians that are inclusive of support, partnership, and information [ 9 ]. However, patients are uncertain about how to phrase their questions and concerns to enable such replies [ 10 , 11 ]. Clinicians have cited difficulties interpreting patients’ secure messages [ 12 ] and as a result, patients have expressed the need for guidance about specific techniques to craft messages to clinicians [ 7 , 10 ]. Therefore, using a user-centered design approach, we developed a web-based application to educate patients about message-writing techniques that would be more likely to achieve the kind of replies they preferred. The application, named SEND, focused on four areas: (1) s pecificity, or narrowing the range of topics patients inquire about, (2) e xpressing concerns and questions, (3) articulating the main n eed or goal of the message, and (4) d irectness, in which messages are succinct and focused.
The application could be used on a computer or smartphone and was intended to be brief (around 10 min) to sustain users’ attention and engagement. It included a video narrated by an oncologist who explained that SM should be used mainly for mild symptoms or questions related to a diagnosis. The oncologist then reviewed each of the four areas, followed by a “knowledge check” multiple-choice question after each section. For instance, after reviewing the importance of including the “who,” “what,” “where,” and “when” in the specificity segment, participants chose a sample message they believed to be most effective at being specific (Fig. 1 ). Feedback about the users’ answer selection was provided after each question. After completing the application, patients could download a tip sheet that highlighted the main points. The objective of this study was to evaluate patients’ satisfaction, engagement, acceptability, and appropriateness of the SEND application.
Example of Knowledge Check question
This study took place between October 2023 and February 2024 in coordination with the University of Florida Health Cancer Center (UFHCC) and was approved by the University of Florida Institutional Review Board (IRB202201138). All procedures were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Patients were eligible to participate if they were (1) 18 years or older, (2) in active treatment, (3) enrolled in the patient portal (MyChart), (4) fluent in English, (5) able to provide informed consent, and (6) diagnosed with one of the most prevalent cancers at UFHCC (breast, lung, prostate, head and neck, and hematological malignancies). A list of eligible patients was generated, and after random selection, patients were contacted via MyChart with a summary of the study’s requirements. We oversampled non-white patients to expand representation.
Interested patients clicked a link to a REDCap questionnaire to confirm their age, cancer diagnosis, status of treatment, and email address to receive the SEND application. Patients with confirmed eligibility received a link to access the application. Upon receipt of the participant clicking the link to view the application, we sent a REDCap survey link to evaluate SEND 1 to 2 weeks later. Two follow-up messages were sent if there was no response. As an incentive, participants received a $25 gift card after completing the survey.
The survey included a screening question to confirm that the application was viewed. In addition to demographic questions, such as age, sex, education, race, and year of cancer diagnosis, we included five measures.
Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy Scale for cancer ( CASE-cancer ) [ 13 ]. CASE-cancer contains 12 items to measure patients’ self-efficacy toward communicating with clinicians and beliefs about managing their disease. For example, “It’s easy for me to ask nurses questions” and “It’s easy for me to share my feelings about having cancer.”
Digital Behavior Change Intervention (DBCI) Engagement Scale [ 14 ] : Ten items assessing behavioral and experiential aspects related to the intervention, such as “How much time (in minutes) did you spend using the tool?” “Which components did you use?” and “How strongly did you experience interest, inattention, enjoyment, intrigue…etc.?” There is no standard threshold of DBCI engagement [ 15 ], and total scores on the scale are only meaningful to the particular intervention tested [ 16 ].
Website User Satisfaction Questionnaire (WUS) [ 17 ] : A measure to investigate the effectiveness of web applications in supporting users’ goals, dividing into three components: (1) information (relevance, accuracy, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness), (2) connection (ease-of-use, entry guidance, structure), and (3) layout.
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) [ 18 ] : Four items to measure the perceived fit of the application, asking whether the application was suitable, fitting, applicable, and a good match.
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) [ 18 ] : Four items to gauge approval, appeal, likeability, and agreeableness.
We described the survey results for each measure using frequencies and percentages. CASE-cancer was calculated by summing responses to questions, ranging from scores of 12–48, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy. DBCI is the percentage of aggregated positive experiences, ranging from 0 to 100%. Three questions were reverse-coded to enable proper calculation. We stratified survey respondents into two groups: “not at all” and by combining “moderately” and “extremely.” WUS is the percentage of aggregated agreement, ranging from 0%-100%. Three questions were reverse-coded for consistent calculation. AIM and IAM are the aggregated agreement among the four questions, ranging from 0%-100%. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to identify if there were significant differences in the mean responses across demographic groups. R version 4.3.2 was used to conduct the analysis.
Of 1,610 eligible patients, all were contacted and sent an invitation to view SEND and take the survey. 111 clicked the link to view SEND, and 101 viewed SEND and completed the survey. Respondents’ mean age was 64 years (range: 21–86), 55% were male, 83% were White, 51% completed a bachelor’s degree or higher, and 66% were married. The median year of diagnosis was 2020, and most patients had prostate cancer (36%), breast cancer (25%), or a hematologic cancer (23%). According to CASE-cancer, respondents had high levels of self-efficacy. The mean overall score was 43.5 out of 48. 96% were confident in their ability to understand cancer materials; 96% agreed that it was easy to ask their doctor questions; 93% found it easy to participate in treatment decisions actively. A full summary of patient characteristics is in Table 1 .
Overall engagement of SEND measured by DBCI was 65%. Respondents spent an average of 15 min interacting with SEND and 100% were interested in using it, 91% enjoyed it, and 76% did not experience negative associations with the application, such as annoyance. Overall mean satisfaction, measured by WUS, was 90.4/100. Respondents found SEND relevant (98%), clearly presented (96%), easy to understand (94%), accurate (89%), and helpful (82%). The mean AIM score was 85.4/100, with 90% approving of it and 86% liking it. The mean IAM score was 88.6/100, and 88% rated it as suitable and 93% applicable.
When comparing differences across the demographic categories, we found that patients without a bachelor’s degree had significantly higher self-efficacy scores compared to those with a bachelor’s or more, and patients with a diagnosis prior to 2023 had higher self-efficacy than patients diagnosed in 2023.
Female respondents overall, as well as those diagnosed with breast cancer, had slightly higher levels of engagement, acceptability, and appropriateness than males, and patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Adults 65 and older had higher levels of engagement, satisfaction, and appropriateness than adults younger than 65. Those without a bachelor’s degree had higher engagement, acceptability, and appropriateness than respondents with a bachelor’s degree or more. Non-white respondents were more engaged and viewed SEND as acceptable at higher rates than white respondents. Those with a diagnosis date before 2023 had higher satisfaction, acceptability, and appropriateness than respondents with a diagnosis year in 2023. Table 2 summarizes the overall scores of each measure by demographic category.
We evaluated a web-based, interactive application to assist patients with cancer in writing effective secure messages to clinicians. The SEND application focused on writing specific messages, expressing concerns and questions, addressing the main need, and being direct. Quiz questions embedded in the application were included with feedback, along with a downloadable summary of the program. Overall, SEND was well-received and rated high in engagement, satisfaction, acceptability, and appropriateness. There were no significant differences related to SEND across age, sex, race, education, or year of diagnosis categories, indicating that the application appealed to a broad range of groups.
eHealth tools like SEND are frequently utilized for cancer care. A review of 24 randomized clinical trials of eHealth applications for people with chronic disease found that the applications improved knowledge, perceived social support, health behaviors, clinical outcomes, and had a positive effect on self-efficacy [ 19 ]. However, users typically do not find eHealth and mHealth apps very engaging, resulting in abandonment [ 20 ]. According to the results of the DBCI Engagement Scale, SEND was found to be very engaging. Few patients cited inattention or distraction while using the application, while nearly all patients enjoyed using it. The average time spent with the application was almost 15 min, and results from WUS confirmed that SEND was easy to understand, presented clearly, and the information was reliable. Our mean of the raw WUS scores was 4.4/5.0. An eHealth intervention for breast cancer survivors that included patient education, feedback, and physical activity support had an average website user satisfaction of 3.8 on a 5-point scale [ 21 ].
Although it is difficult to compare engagement and satisfaction to other interventions since those attributes are specific to the intervention being evaluated, we believe SEND’s high ratings are validated by constructs from Bandura’s social cognitive theory [ 22 ]. SEND incorporated various aspects of social cognitive theory. For instance, we included observational learning by modeling how to craft specific types of messages, and reinforcements, or responses, to the patient’s behavior by including feedback after quiz questions.
Another aspect of our study related to social cognitive theory is self-efficacy. Patients’ high levels of self-efficacy may have contributed to their belief that they were successfully able to learn from the application and write more precise messages. However, patients had statistically significant lower self-efficacy levels if they were diagnosed with cancer in the current year compared to those diagnosed earlier. Since most cancer diagnoses require patients to learn a lot of information quickly, information overload may occur. Information overload is when highly arousing content strains already limited storage and processing capabilities, triggering negative reactions [ 23 ]. Although recently diagnosed patients’ self-efficacy levels were lower than those of more experienced patients, patients of all self-efficacy levels rated SEND highly and believed it was appropriate and acceptable. Therefore, SEND can be an important tool to help enhance patients’ self-efficacy when communicating with clinicians about their cancer. If patients can communicate more confidently using SM, clinicians may be able to respond faster and include relevant information in a patient-centered manner.
We did not find any statistically significant differences related to SEND’s functionality for race, education, age, sex, and year of diagnosis. It is not uncommon for interventions to benefit some groups more than others due to factors such as health literacy, eHealth literacy, the digital divide, technology acceptance, and access to reliable broadband service. Our results demonstrate that SEND may apply to various types of patients with diverse backgrounds. In the future, we will expand our evaluation to specifically measure the impact of health literacy, eHealth literacy, and access to the Internet. We will also assess how SEND influences patient behavior, such as the quality of message writing and other information-seeking and communicative habits with clinicians. It will also be valuable to understand whether patients who incorporate SEND into messages are more satisfied and receive quicker replies than patients who did not use the application. We plan to widely implement SEND and include additional components to the application, such as clarifying the most appropriate uses for SM and how artificial intelligence can assist with message development.
Limitations of our study include it taking place at one cancer center and a large portion of our sample being highly self-efficacious patients. Patients with lower self-efficacy levels may have different expectations or uses of SEND. We also did not collect patients’ stage of cancer. It is worth exploring whether patients with advanced stages are more receptive than patients in earlier stages. Our sample was also mostly white and mainly 60 years or older. It is important to understand the perspective of patients from different races, and younger adults may have a different experience using SEND. Furthermore, it is critical to determine SEND’s acceptability among patients who require technological support or are uncomfortable with technology. We did not monitor how many times patients used the SEND application or the frequency with which the downloadable tip sheet was accessed. Perhaps repeatedly using the application and tip sheet assisted patients more so than those who only used it once. We also were unaware of patients’ message-writing habits. Frequent message writers with experience using SM may have different needs than patients who utilize SM less often. Another limitation is that DBCI scores were only collected from 40 respondents due to a programming error.
We tested the engagement, satisfaction, appropriateness, and acceptability of the SEND web-based application to educate patients about secure message-writing techniques. The application included video tutorials with an interactive quiz and a downloadable tip sheet. Overall, patients rated SEND very highly, signifying that patients embraced the application and desired to improve their messaging skills. As secure messaging continues to be a valued tool for communication among patients and clinicians, it is important to enhance patients’ comfort and confidence when utilizing the tool.
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Street RL, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM (2009) How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns 74:295–301
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Haun JN, Patel NR, Lind JD, Antinori N (2015) Large-scale survey findings inform patients’ experiences in using secure messaging to engage in patient-provider communication and self-care management: a quantitative assessment. J Med Internet Res 17:e282
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Houston TK, Sands DZ, Jenckes MW, Ford DE (2004) Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits, and concerns. Am J Manag Care 10:601–608
PubMed Google Scholar
Manias E, Bucknall T, Wickramasinghe N, Gray K, Schaffer J, Rosenfeld E (2020) Patient and family engagement in communicating with electronic medical records in hospitals: a systematic review. Int J Med Informatics 134:104036
Article Google Scholar
ElKefi S, Asan O (2021) How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: a systematic literature review. Int J Med Informatics 149:104430
Crafoord MT, Fjell M, Sundberg K, Nilsson M, Langius-Eklöf A (2020) Engagement in an interactive app for symptom self-management during treatment in patients with breast or prostate cancer: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res 22:e17058
Alpert JM, Markham MJ, Bjarnadottir RI, Bylund CL (2021) Twenty-first century bedside manner: exploring patient-centered communication in secure messaging with cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 36:16–24
Huang M, Fan J, Prigge J, Shah ND, Costello BA, Yao L (2022) Characterizing patient-clinician communication in secure medical messages: retrospective study. J Med Internet Res 24:e17273
Alpert JM, Wang S, Bylund CL, Markham MJ, Bjarnadottir RI, Lee JH et al (2021) Improving secure messaging: a framework for support, partnership & information-giving communicating electronically (SPICE). Patient Educ Couns 104:1380–1386
Sieck CJ, Hefner JL, Schnierle J, Florian H, Agarwal A, Rundell K et al (2017) The rules of engagement: perspectives on secure messaging from experienced ambulatory patient portal users. JMIR Med Inform 5:e13
Lee JL, Matthias MS, Huffman M, Frankel RM, Weiner M (2020) Insecure messaging: how clinicians approach potentially problematic messages from patients. JAMIA Open 3:576–582
Alpert JM, Hampton CN, Markham MJ, Bylund CL (2022) Clinicians’ attitudes and behaviors towards communicating electronically with patients: a grounded practical theory approach. J Health Commun 27:103–114
Wolf MS, Chang CH, Davis T, Makoul G (2005) Development and validation of the Communication and Attitudinal Self-Efficacy scale for cancer (CASE-cancer). Patient Educ Couns 57:333–341
Perski O, Blandford A, Garnett C, Crane D, West R, Michie S (2020) A self-report measure of engagement with digital behavior change interventions (DBCIs): development and psychometric evaluation of the “DBCI Engagement Scale.” Transl Behav Med 10:267–277
Wang R, Rouleau G, Booth GL, Brazeau AS, El-Dassouki N, Taylor M et al (2023) Understanding whether and how a digital health intervention improves transition care for emerging adults living with type 1 diabetes: protocol for a mixed methods realist evaluation. JMIR Res Protoc 12:e46115
Perski O, Lumsden J, Garnett C, Blandford A, West R, Michie S (2019) Assessing the psychometric properties of the digital behavior change intervention engagement scale in users of an app for reducing alcohol consumption: evaluation study. J Med Internet Res 21:e16197
Muylle S, Moenaert R, Despontin M (2004) The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Inform Manage 41:543–560
Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS et al (2017) Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci 12:108
Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I (2005) Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD004274. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004274.pub4
Mustafa AS, Ali N, Dhillon JS, Alkawsi G, Baashar Y (2022) User engagement and abandonment of mHealth: a cross-sectional survey. Healthcare 10:2
Kuijpers W, Groen WG, Oldenburg HS, Wouters MW, Aaronson NK, van Harten WH (2016) eHealth for breast cancer survivors: use, feasibility and impact of an interactive portal. JMIR Cancer 2:e3
Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lang A (2006) Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. J Commun 56:S57-80
Download references
This work was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) under Award Number 5R03CA273617-02. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. Research reported in this publication was also supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under University of Florida Clinical and Translational Science Awards UL1TR000064 and UL1TR001427.
Authors and affiliations.
Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Mail Code: G-10, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
Jordan M. Alpert
Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Tithi B. Amin & Carma L. Bylund
Biostatistics and Computational Biology Shared Resource, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
Zhang Zhongyue
Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
Merry Jennifer Markham & Martina Murphy
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All listed authors contributed to the data collection, analysis, and manuscript preparation.
Correspondence to Jordan M. Alpert .
Ethics approval.
This study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
All participants provided consent to participate in the study.
Not applicable.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .
Reprints and permissions
Alpert, J.M., Amin, T.B., Zhongyue, Z. et al. Evaluating the SEND eHealth Application to Improve Patients’ Secure Message Writing. J Canc Educ (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02491-0
Download citation
Accepted : 18 August 2024
Published : 02 September 2024
DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02491-0
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
4. Put it all together. Once you've laid out the stem statement, chosen your verb, and identified the outcome, put it all together to form an educational objective. Say you're teaching a high school English class and, for one lesson, you're teaching symbolism.
How to write objectives for learning. Here are some steps you could follow to develop clear and concise learning objectives: 1. Reflect on important skills for students to develop. Learning objectives typically discuss the abilities learners gain from taking your workshop or course.
Steps for Writing an Objective. 1. Write each objective beginning with the phrase "After participating in this session, attendees should be able to . . . .". 2. Choose a verb that matches the desired level of knowledge or skill (see information on Bloom's Taxonomy below). Verbs should indicate specific, measurable, and observable behaviors.
Make sure the objective is measurable and achievable. An example of a training objective derived from a learning objective is: Learning Objective: "The learner will be able to identify the five primary sources of energy used in photosynthesis and explain how they are utilised.".
Create Program Learning objectives that will be addressed multiple times in your core course offering. Identify which objectives are addressed in what course. Identify assessments, direct, indirect, formative, summative to assess whether the students have attained the desired learning. Assess all objectives multiple times to map a continuum of ...
Step 2: Find a state standard you wish to cover with the objective. Add the short-hand abbreviation to the end of the objective. For example, let's say you are teaching Geometry, and want to use standard "G-GMD.3: Use volume formulas for cylinders, pyramids, cones, and spheres to solve problems.". This standard covers several shapes, so ...
Instead, either write them as two separate objectives, or choose the verb that is at the learning level of your students. The second component an effective learning objective must contain is the condition. The condition gives specific and clear guidance to the student as to what they can expect when completing the behavior that is stated.
Writing strong and effective learning objectives is a matter of three simple steps: Explain the precise skill or task the student will perform. Describe how the student will execute the given skill or task and demonstrate relevant knowledge and competency—a quiz, test, group discussion, presentation, research project.
How to write learning objectives: acher performancesubject matterhow knowledge was acquiredLearn. objectives should have the following S.M.A.R.T. attributes. Specific - Statement of learning are concise a. well defined in describing what students will be able to do. Measurable - Use action / measurable verbs that can be observed through any ...
In the world of online education, clear communication is paramount for student success. Recent research underscores the importance of well-defined learning objectives, particularly in e-learning environments. ... Such statements are known as learning objectives. The writing of objectives is probably one of the best-known components of the ...
Writing Effective Learning Objectives. Effective teaching depends upon effective planning and design. The first step in preparing a high quality course is to clearly define your educational goals, which are the broad, overarching expectations for student learning and performance at the end of your course. (See The Innovative Instructor post ...
55 Learning Objectives Examples. Learning objectives are explicit statements that clearly express what learners should be able to comprehend, perform or experience by the end of a course or instructional period (Adams, 2015). They are fundamental to the process of educational planning and instructional design, acting as vehicles that drive both ...
Example Learning Objectives. Identify the major organs and systems of the human body. Explain the functions of each organ and system in maintaining homeostasis. Analyze the interrelationships between different organs and systems in the human body.
Behavioral Verbs. The key to writing learning objectives is using an action verb to describe the behavior you intend for students to perform. You can use action verbs such as calculate, read, identify, match, explain, translate, and prepare to describe the behavior further. On the other hand, words such as understand, appreciate, internalize, and value are not appropriate when writing learning ...
Start your course objectives with: By the end of the course, students will be able to: Choose an action verb that corresponds to the specific action you wish students to demonstrate. Explain the knowledge students are expected to acquire or construct. [Optional]: explain the criterion or level students are expected to reach to show mastery of ...
The SMART framework breaks down learning objectives into five key characteristics: Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Each characteristic plays a pivotal role in creating a comprehensive learning goal that is practical, attainable, and aligned with overall educational targets.
This part of the objective will describe the situation of the participants. Degree of Mastery: This part of the objective is closely tied to the change in behavior, as it stipulates the degree of the change. Try labeling each of the four components in your objectives to make sure you didn't forget anything.
idance for Writing Behavioral Learning Objectives There are key components of well-written behavioral learning objectives that - when incorporated - allow. or an optimal, articulated experience for learners. Consider using. ng your objectives. Are my learning objectives: • observable and measurable (i.e., u.
There are four components of an objective: 1) the action verb, 2) conditions, 3) standard, and 4) the intended audience (always the student). The action verb is the most important element of an objective and can never be omitted. The action verb states precisely what the student will do following instruction.
Here are common tips for setting objectives of any field. Best tips on how to write objectives. #1. Be concise and straightforward. Keep the words as simple and straightforward as much as possible. It is much better to remove unnecessary or ambiguous words that might lead to misunderstanding. #2.
1. Writing effective learning objectives will a. Help you clarify the goals and objectives of your course b. Help the student understand what is important and valued by the course director. c. Facilitate objective and effective evaluation of students . 2. The LCME requires it. "The faculty of a medical school define its medical education program
Well-defined learning objectives outline the desired outcome for learners, which will help specify the instructional method. For example, if we want the learners to demonstrate correct intubation procedure in a normal adult 100% of the time, we need the instructional method to involve some sort of hands-on experience so that learners can ...
Related: 70+ Resume Objective Examples (With Tips and How-To Guide) 6. Focus on key teaching skills. When creating your education objective, include teaching skills to show employers how you can contribute to the organization. Employers in the education sector value skills such as: Tolerance.
Achievable Steps: Set objectives that are realistic and attainable based on the students' current abilities, such as "complete a reading assignment with minimal guidance." Relevant Content: Ensure that the objectives align with broader educational goals and the needs of the learners. For example, if students are learning about ecosystems ...
To serve as a foundation for a well-balanced and appropriate education: GOAL 1: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the reading and writing of the English language. GOAL 2: The students in the public education system will demonstrate exemplary performance in the understanding of mathematics.
L.SS.6.1. Demonstrate command of the system and structure of the English language when writing or speaking. Ensure that pronouns are in the proper case (subjective, objective, possessive). Use intensive pronouns (e.g., myself, ourselves). Recognize and correct inappropriate shifts in pronoun number and person.
In response, we designed a user-centered, web-based application named SEND The application focuses on specificity, expression, needs, and directness through interactive video tutorials and quizzes. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate SEND based on its levels of engagement, satisfaction, acceptability, and appropriateness.